Analysis Of David Reimer s From Undoing Gender

While Judith Butler’s claim in her essay â€Å"From Undoing Gender† is challenging, complex, and comprehensible, she provides somewhat enough evidence, and analysis of David Reimer’s case to prove her claim that society uses language to set the norms of what a gender should be and how one should act in accordance with one’s gender. First, Butler’s use of David Reimer’s case, known as â€Å"the John/Joan case† (Interview: John Colapinto†), â€Å"a boy who accidentally had his penis burned and subsequently amputated at the age of eight months† (740-741), is somewhat sufficient to prove a claim that most people would resist accepting. William and Colomb have expounded that, â€Å"The more readers resist a claim, the more evidence they want† (114). A majority of the readers’ resist Butler’s claim because they apprehend only so little on the basis of their own language context that they cannot see past that . Language expects us to define ourselves as distinct, identifiable, just like everyone else.Hence, language utilizes a sense of entitlement established by law and society. We commit an error based on taking meanings in a literal fashion to be a sufficient description of what we are. As readers of Butler’s narrative we are face with limitations regarding on what we grasp and perceive due to what is â€Å"between us and the reality† (741). Moreover, this dialect will set up our authenticity inside a lawful structure tucked away in liberal renditions of human philosophy. Yet, it neglects to do equity to